Why Safer Building Access Should Be Part of Every Facility Management Plan

0

Ask anyone responsible for managing a large commercial building what their week looks like, and you’ll probably get a fairly long answer. There’s always something that needs attention. A lift stops working, an air conditioning unit develops a fault, or a contractor needs access to a part of the building nobody has visited for months. That’s all before the scheduled maintenance work even begins.

With so much to organize, it’s understandable that facilities managers spend most of their time concentrating on keeping equipment running and making sure repairs happen when they’re supposed to. What doesn’t always get the same attention is how maintenance workers actually reach that equipment. It’s an important distinction. Having a servicing schedule for a rooftop ventilation unit is all well and good, but if reaching it involves climbing over pipes or squeezing through an awkward gap, there’s a problem worth addressing.

The Parts of a Building Most People Never See

For employees and visitors, getting around a commercial property usually means using entrances, corridors, staircases, and lifts. Facilities teams have a rather different experience. Their work takes them into plant rooms, service areas, rooftops and other spaces that weren’t necessarily designed with everyday foot traffic in mind.

Some of these areas are accessed regularly. Others might only need attention during annual inspections or when equipment breaks down. Either way, somebody eventually has to get there, often carrying tools or replacement parts. The difficulty is that access arrangements don’t always keep pace with changes to the building.

Take a warehouse that has gradually expanded its ventilation system. New equipment gets installed wherever there’s room, additional pipework is fitted, and the original maintenance route becomes increasingly awkward. Nobody necessarily intended to create a hazard. The layout changed over time, and the route people use to reach the equipment wasn’t reconsidered.

It’s worth looking at these spaces from the perspective of the person carrying out the work. Can they reach everything without climbing over obstacles? Is there enough room to move safely? Would the route still be manageable in poor weather or while carrying equipment?

Rooftops Can Be Particularly Awkward Places to Work

From street level, a commercial roof can look like a large, open surface. Spend a little time up there, though, and you’ll often find a surprisingly complicated arrangement of ducts, air conditioning equipment, cables, and pipework.

Maintenance workers may need to cross several obstacles just to reach one unit. Add wet surfaces, strong winds, or changes in roof level, and a straightforward inspection can become much more demanding than expected.

It’s tempting to assume experienced contractors will find their own way around these difficulties. After all, they’ve probably worked on plenty of similar buildings. But experience shouldn’t be a substitute for proper access arrangements, particularly where a mistake could result in a serious fall.

In some cases, the answer might be as simple as clearing an existing route or changing where equipment is positioned. Where permanent obstacles cannot be moved, purpose-built access equipment may be more appropriate. For instance, step over platforms from keesafety.com provide a designated way to cross rooftop pipework, ducts, and other obstructions without having to climb directly over them.

These systems can be configured with steps, platforms, and handrails to suit different circumstances. Naturally, the roof’s construction, load capacity, and the work being carried out all need to be taken into account before anything is installed.

Difficult Access Has a Cost Beyond the Safety Concerns

Nobody wants an employee or contractor to get hurt, and preventing injuries should be reason enough to take building access seriously. But poor access can create other problems that are less immediately obvious.

Imagine arranging a routine maintenance visit, only for the contractor to discover that reaching the equipment requires additional access equipment. What should have been a relatively short job now takes a lot longer. Another appointment might be needed, and somebody has to rearrange the schedule.

One awkward visit isn’t necessarily a major financial problem. When similar difficulties crop up repeatedly across a large property, however, the wasted time can start to add up.

Access problems can also complicate preventative maintenance. Equipment that’s difficult to reach may require more planning, extra personnel, or temporary safety arrangements every time it’s inspected. Those aren’t reasons to skip the work, of course, but they do make routine servicing harder to organize.

For facilities managers working with limited budgets, it’s worth thinking about how much time is being spent dealing with the same access difficulties year after year.

Ask the People Doing the Maintenance

One of the simplest ways to identify access problems is to speak to the people who use these areas regularly. Contractors and maintenance engineers often know exactly which routes are awkward, where water collects after heavy rain, and which pieces of equipment are particularly difficult to reach.

That knowledge doesn’t always make its way back to the facilities manager. A contractor might work around an obstacle, finish the job, and leave without mentioning it because the difficulty has become part of the routine.

A short conversation after a maintenance visit can be surprisingly useful. Was the equipment easy to reach? Did anything slow the work down? Have recent building alterations made the route more difficult?

The answers can help managers identify problems that wouldn’t necessarily appear during an ordinary inspection. Keeping a record of recurring issues also makes it easier to decide which improvements need attention first.

A Better Plan Doesn’t Always Mean a Bigger Budget

It’s easy to assume that improving building access will involve expensive alterations. Sometimes it does, particularly where a property has serious design limitations. But plenty of improvements are relatively modest.

Moving stored materials away from an access route, improving lighting, repairing damaged steps, or reviewing how contractors enter restricted areas can all make a difference. Other situations may call for more substantial work, such as installing permanent platforms or changing the layout around essential equipment.

The key is to understand the problem before choosing a solution. Spending money on equipment that doesn’t suit the building won’t achieve much, and repeatedly paying for temporary arrangements won’t help either when a permanent improvement might be more practical.

Facilities management is often about making sensible decisions with the resources available. Safe access deserves to be part of those decisions, rather than something that’s only thought about when a contractor raises a concern.

Buildings need regular maintenance, and the people carrying it out shouldn’t have to negotiate unnecessary obstacles just to do their jobs. Looking at access routes properly, listening to the workers who use them, and reviewing arrangements as buildings change can prevent a great deal of frustration. More importantly, it helps make sure that essential maintenance doesn’t come with risks that could reasonably have been avoided.

Share.

About Author

Founded in 1994 by the late Pamela Hulse Andrews, Cascade Business News (CBN) became Central Oregon’s premier business publication. CascadeBusNews.com • CBN@CascadeBusNews.com

Comments are closed.