UO President Part of Call to Congress and Obama to Close Innovation Deficit

165 universities launch national effort to urge a restoration of investments in research and education.

Deeply concerned about major federal budget cuts to research and higher education at a time when other nations are steadily increasing investments in those areas, University of Oregon President Michael Gottfredson today joined 164 other university presidents and chancellors in calling on leaders in Washington to close what they call the “innovation deficit.”

In an open letter to President Obama and Congress published as an advertisement today in the influential Washington, D.C., publication Politico, Gottfredson and his fellow university leaders wrote that closing the innovation deficit — the widening gap between needed and actual investments in research and education — must be a national imperative.

The higher education leaders noted that investments in those areas lead to the types of innovation and new technologies that power the nation’s economy, create jobs, and reduce the budget deficit while ensuring the U.S. maintains its role as global leader.

“Throughout our history, this nation has kept the promise of a better tomorrow to each generation,” Gottfredson and his colleagues wrote. “This has been possible because of our economic prosperity based in large part on America‘s role as global innovation leader. Failing to deal with the innovation deficit will pass to future generations the burdens of lost leadership in innovation, economic decline, and limited job opportunities. We call upon you to reject unsound budget cuts and recommit to strong and sustained investments in research and education. Only then can we ensure that our nation’s promise of a better tomorrow endures.”

Kimberly Andrews Espy, UO vice president for research and innovation and dean of the Graduate School, echoed those sentiments and applauded the action by Gottfredson and his colleagues.

“Sequestration threatens our future by reducing the positive economic and social impact of federally sponsored research,” Espy said. “Research creates programs that enrich our communities and fuels the technologies and tools that are the basis of innovation and competitiveness for the economy of tomorrow. We urge Congress and the President to find an alternative means of reducing our budget deficit and reaffirming our nation’s commitment to research and education.”

Economists agree that more than half of U.S. economic growth since World War II is a consequence of technological innovation, much of which results from federally funded scientific research conducted at U.S. universities. Such groundbreaking research, the university leaders noted, has led to life-saving vaccines, lasers, MRI, touchscreens, GPS, the Internet and many other advances that have improved lives and generated entire new sectors of our economy.  

The university leaders pointed out that over the past two decades, China, Singapore and South Korea have dramatically increased their investments in research and higher education, having seen the enormous benefits such investments have had for the U.S. economy. The rate of growth of U.S. research and development investments has been outstripped by those of China, Singapore and South Korea by two to four times during that period.

The university leaders’ initiative comes as Congress faces critical budget decisions in the coming months. Annual funding bills, the debt limit, and measures to eliminate or modify the deep across-the-board spending cuts forced by sequestration could all be taken up this fall. While the legislative path for those measures remains unclear, the presidents and chancellors noted that targeted investments in research and higher education can and should be made regardless of overall funding levels because they would be key sources of long-term economic growth and fiscal stability.

“Because the innovation deficit undermines economic growth it harms our nation’s overall fiscal health, worsening long-term budget deficits and debt,” Gottfredson and his colleagues wrote.  “Investments in research and education are not inconsistent with long-term deficit reduction; they are vital to it.”

The 165 universities represented in the letter are all members of the Association of American Universities (http://www.aau.edu/) and/or the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (http://www.aplu.org/).

The open letter, including a list of all of its signers, is available at: http://www.innovationdeficit.org/.

About the University of Oregon
The University of Oregon is among the 108 institutions chosen from 4,633 U.S. universities for top-tier designation of “Very High Research Activity” in the 2010 Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. The UO also is one of two Pacific Northwest members of the Association of American Universities.

Media Contacts: Joe Mosley, UO Office of Strategic Communications, 541-346-3606, jmosley@uoregon.edu, or Lewis Taylor, associate director of PR and strategic communications, 541-517-6201, lewist@uoregon.edu
Like UO Science on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/UniversityOfOregonScience
Follow UO Science on Twitter: https://twitter.com/UO_Research